NPLNotes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (added tag) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[PREP_2011|Prep Main Page]] > [[PREP_2011_Web_Conference_IV|Web Conference 4]] > NPL Notes | |||
==Notes on the NPL: What it has, What it needs== | ==Notes on the NPL: What it has, What it needs== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
===Issues=== | ===Issues=== | ||
Should there be a "new" NPL that we should consider? Either peer reviewed, or with reduced redundancy, etc.? | |||
====Additional Metadata==== | ====Additional Metadata==== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
* Frequency of use, or number of errors per problem; could this be gathered from remote sites? | * Frequency of use, or number of errors per problem; could this be gathered from remote sites? | ||
** When should this be done? Browser, or instructor based---so an instructor could submit the use by course; or as something that runs from the NPL-Update script? | ** When should this be done? Browser, or instructor based---so an instructor could submit the use by course; or as something that runs from the NPL-Update script? | ||
* Ability to tell, from the library browser, which problems have solutions or hints; or which problems use MathObjects; or which are graphical. | |||
* "Parent" or "child" data: this problem is an edit of that, etc. | |||
====Missing Functionality==== | ====Missing Functionality==== | ||
| Line 20: | Line 26: | ||
* Would a full text search be useful? Possible? | * Would a full text search be useful? Possible? | ||
* Ability to restrict the text editions that are displayed in the library browser---either by having the WeBWorK administrator check the texts that would be displayed, or by grandfathering out of existence some of the older texts | * Ability to restrict the text editions that are displayed in the library browser---either by having the WeBWorK administrator check the texts that would be displayed, or by grandfathering out of existence some of the older texts | ||
* Peer review. Should there be a peer reviewed NPL? | |||
* Support for problems in different languages---Spanish, etc. | |||
* Search for problems using graphics, etc. | |||
* Support for boolean operators in the search: and, or,... | |||
* Support for variation in units in a problem (feet, meters, etc.) | |||
====Redundancy==== | ====Redundancy==== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 37: | ||
* Group problems by cohort, so that one of the problems is displayed, and the rest of the cohort could be displayed on request. | * Group problems by cohort, so that one of the problems is displayed, and the rest of the cohort could be displayed on request. | ||
[[Category:PREP 2011]] | |||
Latest revision as of 17:22, 16 June 2021
Prep Main Page > Web Conference 4 > NPL Notes
Notes on the NPL: What it has, What it needs
The NPL was created by Jeff Holt, John Jones and Bill Ziemer.
Organization
By default, we see a page with subject, chapter, section.
Issues
Should there be a "new" NPL that we should consider? Either peer reviewed, or with reduced redundancy, etc.?
Additional Metadata
- Learning objectives (can this be addressed by more or better keyword tagging, and/or semantic tagging?)
- Frequency of use, or number of errors per problem; could this be gathered from remote sites?
- When should this be done? Browser, or instructor based---so an instructor could submit the use by course; or as something that runs from the NPL-Update script?
- Ability to tell, from the library browser, which problems have solutions or hints; or which problems use MathObjects; or which are graphical.
- "Parent" or "child" data: this problem is an edit of that, etc.
Missing Functionality
- Keyword tagging is very uneven. Can this be improved?
- Would a full text search be useful? Possible?
- Ability to restrict the text editions that are displayed in the library browser---either by having the WeBWorK administrator check the texts that would be displayed, or by grandfathering out of existence some of the older texts
- Peer review. Should there be a peer reviewed NPL?
- Support for problems in different languages---Spanish, etc.
- Search for problems using graphics, etc.
- Support for boolean operators in the search: and, or,...
- Support for variation in units in a problem (feet, meters, etc.)
Redundancy
There are a lot of problems that are very similar. How can we address issue?
- Group problems by cohort, so that one of the problems is displayed, and the rest of the cohort could be displayed on request.